On a thick grey damp morning in south Ft. Worth, Texas, small gatherings began to form at Will Rogers park. My friend and I showed up eager to march with James Talarico and 99-year-old Opal Lee, the Grandmother of Juneteenth.

Huddled under our umbrellas with a few others in their Talafreako tees, we paused to listen to the the voice of Opal Lee coming from the makeshift stage: “Don’t just walk for yourself, walk for your family, walk for the ancestors who dreamed of this kind of freedom, and walk for the work that still has to be done.”
We were a small ripple in the wave of regular Juneteenth walkers, and notably whiter in complexion. As we began to walk, a woman stopped me to pass on a message, assuming my white tee and matching complexion gave me special access:
“Tell him Federal workers have suffered,” she stated with irritation. I started to explain smiling and she cut me off, “I am serious. We have suffered.” My smile faded, “Yes,” was all I could utter. She understood my power and access better than I did.
I turned back to the crowd ahead of me just as Talarico stepped out of a car and into the throng of marchers. At 5’ 8” tall, James got swallowed up in the sea of people stopping to take a photo with him. He wore his signature dark grey button down untucked, sleeves rolled up neatly, wrangler jeans and cowboy boots. He walked with the slight bow-legged walk of a ranch hand while exuding the nerdy gentleness of a former middle school language arts teacher and speaking with the wise, easygoing steadiness of a Presbyterian minister.His demeanor read as genuine and kind with an unrushed and unaffected quiet confidence. He was hardly recognizable as a politician.
What is it about this guy, Talarico? What makes him tick? Why does he seem unfazed by critique? What drives him to remain respectful despite the hate he receives. How does he keep his anger in check? How does he appear unflappable? I don’t know about you, but my good intentions get derailed by the what abouts: What about the cruelty? What about the abuse? What about the greed? What about the lies? What about. . . ? And how can I love my neighbor if I don’t like them?
Many on the political right are trying to discredit him saying he is “weak. soft. weird.” Schoolyard bullying is hardly a surprise for this former middle school teacher. As grown men hurl names like, “Tofu Talarico, Six-gender Jimmy, Low T Talarico, and Talafreako,” JT barely skips a beat, rolls out a Talafreako Tee and continues with his campaign to bring Texans together.
His genuine, empathetic demeanor threatens the system — the understood strong masculine hierarchy— with words like unity, love, everyone is welcome; reminding us we are all Texans. He reminds us Hope is an action that lies in the We not the me. He reminds us that we belong to each other.
It’s no secret that Talarico is a Christian. He is the love your neighbor kind, the love as an action verb kind, the love like Jesus kind, the welcome the stranger kind, the build bridges not walls kind, the feed the hungry kind, the Sermon on the Mount, Beatitudes kind, the love your enemy kind.
One of his first speeches from the Texas House of Representatives floor went viral for his audacity to use scripture and Christian language to critique fellow Christians. Apparently, the only thing more threatening to a Christian Nationalist than The Sermon on The Mount is facing a public school teacher and seminarian who has done his homework.
Talarico makes clear, “We were not founded as a Christian nation. We were founded as a nation where you are free to be a Christian, or a Jew, or a Muslim, or a Sikh, or a Buddhist, or an atheist.”
He also gives clarity to who counts as Texan by showing up and listening to people from all zip codes across Texas: from historically Black neighborhoods, to overlooked neighborhoods to rural red towns to blue cities. People are angry and tired of broken promises. He seems fearless and endlessly curious to hear from the furthest out, to lean into hard conversations, to disrupt the status quo. He explains how people will regularly whisper in his ear, “I am a conservative.”
He received criticism from his own party supporters for doing a two hour and 41 minute interview with Joe Rogan, who was an early vocal advocate of Trump. He expects and welcomes people’s fears, frustrations, and anger. He listens intently and validates them.
“He is the first politician who makes me hopeful,” said my 22-year-old who shared the Rogan podcast with me. “He listens to people and doesn’t judge them. He never makes anyone feel dumb, just really listens. He says my generation will be the one to make a difference.”
It is no small thing to make young men feel seen, heard and valued. Talarico is not showing up in spaces asking anyone to be different. He is saying: You matter. You are worthy.
He poses a threat precisely because his presence threatens and inverts the usual power-over, top-down structure with a bottom-up servant of the people one. “He punches up not down,” one blogger explains. He disrupts the status quo. He reminds people of their inherent worth and value and refuses to normalize the greed and corruption that has dominated state and national politics. He won’t take PAC or special interest money. He threatens the protections of the privileged by calling the wealthy to account while reminding everyday Texans: “The biggest divide in this country is not left vs. right but top vs. bottom.”
What is a surprise to no one is how this race is even close. The party of the Moral Majority seems concerned with anything other than morality and is unapologetic about it. At least now, the pretense has been dropped. Talarico, with the steady moral compass of an Eagle Scout, is running against the scandalous, adulterous Ken Paxton, impeached by his own party.
And still, in Texas, the race is close. While many Hispanic voters have swung from red to blue for Talarico, conservative white voters, particularly evangelicals, have remained loyal to the GOP. And for those who choose not to vote and see that as the moral high ground, a non-vote is a vote. It is a vote for the status quo. With less than 100 days left until November, Texans will be faced with a vote and an undeniable reality.

As we neared the end of the Juneteenth march, a woman ahead of us screamed with excitement and hugged Talarico as her friend snapped a photo. The friend walked past us, exhaled, and said,
“He is a good man.”
18 Responses
Kerin,
Thanks for this! Your portrait of Talarico makes me hopeful and grateful that such a good man is running. Thanks, too, for your good work on his/our behalf.
Thanks Mark. I appreciate your nudge and words of encouragement. This community of voices has kept me connected to a Christian faith community I have struggled to recognize at times.
This is SO great, thank you, Kerin.
Thanks so much, Kathy! Grateful for your encouragement and ongoing connection.
I don’t mind the information and opinion, but this feels like a political ad to me. I hope that between now and November RJ doesn’t turn into a political platform for the writers favorite candidates.
Thanks for your engagement, Diane. I appreciate your perspective. The intention of my blog was to create a portrait of a person who is drawing people together across the political divide, one who makes me question my own defenses and biases. I am grateful for spaces like the RJ, where creative, thoughtful and critical engagement is possible.
I’m sorry, but I can’t take this guy seriously. He’s made the argument that in the Annunciation, God sought Mary’s consent (a questionable reading) and that because God sought Mary’s consent, we need to protect abortion rights. Not sure how you get from God announcing the coming Messiah to support for killing an unborn child – I’ve heard a lot of argument for abortion, but this one takes the cake as the most ridiculous.
This is an extreme example of taking the clear language of scripture, then massaging and twisting it through enough contortions that you can make it say what you want it to say. There is plenty of this contortionism in Christian Nationalism and elsewhere on the extreme Christian right, as writers on this blog are always eager to point out. Y’all should be a bit more aware of when it happens on your side of the spectrum.
I thought that one reason Mary is held such high regard is her “yes” to God despite what it cost her. Did she really have no choice? Isn’t that one lesson of the story of Adam and Eve: That God didn’t create robots but instead gave them a choice as to whether or not to obey?
Regardless, it’s a ridiculous stretch to take that as an argument in favor of abortion.
Tom, you are correct. It’s too bad that the Reformed Journal does not point out the weakness/moral flaws of the extreme left on many issues. I’m not saying that the extreme right doesn’t deserve criticism, but more balanced reporting would be welcome!
Thanks for your comment, Tom. The debate around an issue and how it is interpreted in scripture is worthy of our time. The idea that we can disagree on interpretations and then wrestle with how we live that out seems to be the story of our Christian faith journey. It is interesting how one person’s ‘clear language of scripture’ differs from another. I wish we could lean more into curiosity over certainty and get out of the comfort zones of “sides.”
Kerin,
Love this!! Sounds like the kind of person we all need! In our red states, hoping that he can make a difference!!
Thank you, Paul for including me in this conversation!!
Love you both!
Oma/Mom
Thanks Oma!
“Apparently, the only thing more threatening to a Christian Nationalist than The Sermon on The Mount is facing a public school teacher and seminarian who has done his homework.”
Love that line. And love the hope for us and for the generations that follow. I don’t understand how it can even be a race, and I’m sad that it’s not surprising to me (or others) that it is a race.
Thanks for walking, for writing, and for keeping the hope alive.
With you in it, Kathryn!
Love the title–that’s one of my favorite songs of a previous era. Long live the memory of that song and the action it seeks to inspire.
Haha – yes, was playing in my ears too!
Thanks Kerin: As you noted, the title of your article come from Buffalo Springfield’s “For What It’s Worth” in 1966. It’s one of my favorite songs (easily the top 100 of all time for me). Though we might think it was about Vietnam War protests, it was about young people protesting curfew laws. The opening line, “There’s something happening here,” could sound a note of hope, but the tune and verse lyrics are actually quite ominous: “There’s battle lines being drawn And nobody’s right if everybody’s wrong. Young people speaking their minds. gettin’ so much resistance from behind…What a field day for the heat, a thousand people in the street, singing songs and a-carryin’ signs, mostly say, ‘Hooray for our side’…Paranoia strikes deep, into your life it will creep. It starts when you’re always afraid. Step out of line, the man come and take you away.” It’s anticipating heavy-handed governmental action in dealing with dissent. As for Talarico, I hear good gospel words from him and also some moral ideas I find odd and even wrong. Yet he seems to be a far better option than the scandal-ridden Paxton. No candidate is perfect, but some are definitely better than others. “For what it’s worth,” the only perfect One in this world never ran for election, and probably would have lost if he had. We didn’t elect Jesus, but God elected us through Jesus to be salt and light in this world.